Sign in

Agriculture and Fishing

Sectoral private sector credit. Rupees million, annual.

Data source: Central Bank of Sri Lanka, Monetary Survey - Annual (1995 to Latest (22 Apr 2026)

Macro Lab · LK.MON.SECTORAL_CREDIT.AGRICULTURE_AND_FISHING.A · CC BY 4.0

Download

About this series

  • Source Central Bank of Sri Lanka, compiled by Macro Lab
  • Unit Rupees million
  • Date range 2024 – 2025
  • Last checked 22 Apr 2026

Checks: 1 recorded for this series, listed below.

Show more

Details

Name in the warehouse
Sectoral private sector credit: Agriculture and Fishing
Read from
CBSL statistical tables (Central Bank of Sri Lanka)
Source page
https://www.cbsl.gov.lk/en/statistics/statistical-tables
Notes
CBSL table4.01, 'Sectoral Credit' sheet: commercial banks' outstanding loans and advances to the private sector by sector, End-December. 2024 is from the discontinued Quarterly Survey; 2025 from the new Monthly Survey (footnote a) - the two use different compilation methods, so this 2-point series spans a methodology break. Item-level 2025 figures differ from table4.02's own December column by a reclassification between sectors that leaves the Total unchanged (see check()); 'of which,' items are partial, as in the monthly series.

Source documents

Vintages

One vintage so far, published 22 Apr 2026. Revisions show here once a later release changes a value.

Related series

Source discrepancies

What the warehouse found when it checked this series: the same figure from two agencies, splice overlaps, published rates against ones recalculated from the index, and outliers.

  • Disagrees with itself2025

    This series reads 911,842; the same figure from the other source reads 916,523. Compared with LK.MON.SECTORAL_CREDIT.AGRICULTURE_AND_FISHING.M.

    Two agencies: 911,841.793 and 916,523.34, difference −4,681.547.

    Sectoral credit: table4.01's End-December 2025 figure (published 2026-04-22) differs from table4.02's own December column for the same item (published 2026-08-11) - the sector-level Total still matches exactly, so this is a reclassification between the two publications, not a random revision